I’m not sure what Bruno Latour means by paradigm. It’s highlighted but I’m confused what his definition is of it.
The last paragraph on page 35 is entirely too confusing.
What does he mean when he refers to citations having a life span? That’s impossible.
His writing is very confusing until he gets rolling. His examples are hard to follow– especially when he refers to them in mid-sentence. While Im trying to comprehend what that sentence is saying, he wants me to remember what the last few sentences say. That was hard to do because I am not exactly very familiar with his examples.
Apparently, all facts can be questioned and become outdated like sources unless they are supported by nature. That’s also confusing and discouraging.
Most claims and facts come from laboratories.
How does he interpret objectivity and subjectivity into fact and artefact?
Whats a dissenter and actant?
